
Editoral Commentary
Houston… I think we have a problem. Three people asked for Trustee Scott’s resignation at the Vermilion Township Board of Trustees meeting tonight.

These complaints stem from Trustee Scott’s behavior at public meetings and his actions in private. Specifically, concerns were raised about last month’s meeting. At tonight’s Vermilion Township Board of Trustees meeting, three residents publicly called for Trustee Scott’s resignation. However, they weren’t the only ones raising concerns. Trustee Baughman, in an interview with me, stated that Scott’s behavior and actions were a significant factor in his decision to speak out. His concerns, along with those of the residents, highlight growing unease about Scott’s ability to effectively fulfill his duties in office.
I attended that meeting last month, and Scott was undoubtedly struggling to run it. With Chair Bob Kurtz absent, Vice Chair Scott was responsible for leading the discussion, but it was clear he was having significant difficulty. Throughout the meeting, he required constant assistance from the Fiscal Officer and Trustee Baughman. Having had experience around individuals in the early stages of cognitive decline, I recognized several signs that raised concern. I wasn’t the only one—others in attendance saw the same thing and spoke tonight.
Don’t take my word for it. I recorded the meeting. You can listen for yourself: Meeting Recording.
The reason Trustee Baughman stood up and spoke about this issue is because it matters. Trustee Scott is the deciding vote on critical township issues, and his vote consistently aligns with Trustee Kurtz. This raises serious questions about whether key decisions are being made with independent thought—or just rubber-stamped approvals.
Big business was conducted tonight, with major discussions surrounding Redwood’s final plans. There were numerous unanswered questions, yet as expected, Scott voted in line with Kurtz, and the plans were accepted. The response from the audience was immediate—audible comments and criticisms over what many see as a troubling alliance between Kurtz and Scott.
The concerns raised at the Vermilion Township Board of Trustees meeting are not just about one person’s health—they’re about the integrity of the decisions being made for the entire township. If a trustee is struggling to follow discussions, manage meetings, or think critically about major business matters, how can we trust that they’re making informed votes? With Trustee Scott acting as the deciding vote on major developments like Redwood, this isn’t just a minor issue—it’s a serious risk to the community’s future. Vermilion Township deserves leadership that is fully present, engaged, and capable. If there’s any doubt about that, it’s time for real discussions about accountability and action.
2 thoughts on “Why Did Three Residents Call for a Trustee’s Resignation—And Why Did Another Trustee Raise Concerns?”