Editorial Commentary
Recently, this question keeps popping up to us from the community: “Why is our school district holding the levy in May instead of November?” While there are several practical reasons for this timing, one key factor is the strategic expectation regarding voter turnout. Let us try to reason and explain the potential whys on why a school district would hold the election in May over November.
Focused Attention on the Issue
In May, the levy typically appears as the only or one of very few ballot items. This means voters are less distracted by other state or national issues, allowing the community to concentrate on the school funding proposal.
Leveraging Lower Voter Turnout
A lower voter turnout can actually work in favor of passing the levy. The school district anticipates that its core supporters—those who are most invested in the success of local schools—are more likely to vote in an off-cycle election. In contrast, a broader turnout in November might include more voters who are less familiar with or less supportive of the measure. This strategy suggests that a smaller, more committed voter base could more easily secure the approval of the levy.
Better Budget Alignment
Holding the levy in May provides ample time for the district to integrate the approved funds into its budget planning, ensuring that the new resources are allocated efficiently before the school year begins.
Avoiding Political Clutter
November elections are often crowded with multiple races and measures, which can overshadow local issues. A May election helps to keep the focus solely on the school funding measure, ensuring it is evaluated on its merits.
Regulatory and Local Considerations
Local administrative requirements or state laws may also make a May election more practical, aligning with deadlines and other logistical needs.
While there are many reasons for choosing May, the strategy of capitalizing on a lower voter turnout—where the most supportive voices are expected to come out—seems to play the most significant role in the decision to schedule the levy at this time. What do you think the reasons are Vermilionites? Most importantly though, will you be coming out to vote in this May election?
Be sure to come out to Vermilion High School this Wednesday, March 12 at 6pm in the library for a community informational meeting on the bond levy. Ask and get answers to your questions from the Administration and School Board Members.
When there is literally nothing else on the ballot in Vermilion, and VSD excludes the Firelands portion of Vermilion, low voter turnout is the main reason. Budget shouldn’t be, since the taxes aren’t collected until Jan. 2026, relate to a bond issue of $47 million to be bid and spent once the issue is passed. But it does complicate a “2nd bite of apple” if fails in May and they put something on in November (though they could possibly put something on for late December if fails?). The bonds are sold on the expectation of revenue over the term of the levy. The only budgetary issue might be planning for maintenance spending before Jan. 1, 2026 if the issue failed.
Why are the levy supporters blocking people and deleting questions? I pointed out their chart about Starbucks drinks refers to a luxury many taxpayers don’t have. Gone. Photos of the year old concrete already tore up at VHS are gone. Pointing out their complaint about VES being already ten years old – gone. Our schools’ propaganda machine is at work, folks.